≡ Menu

≡ Menu

Life Insurance Approvals After Mitral Valve Prolapse (Click-Murmur Syndrome). Everything You Need to Know at a Glance!

🎯 Bottom Line Up Front

Can you get life insurance with mitral valve prolapse (click-murmur syndrome)? Yes, in most cases, and often at preferred or standard rates.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) without significant mitral regurgitation typically qualifies for preferred or standard rates when asymptomatic and requiring no treatment beyond occasional monitoring—the majority of MVP cases fall into this benign category. MVP with mild mitral regurgitation usually qualifies for standard to table 2-4 ratings depending on ejection fraction and left atrial size, while moderate to severe regurgitation, thickened valve leaflets (>5mm), enlarged left atrium, or symptoms requiring medication result in table 4-8 ratings or occasionally postponement for additional cardiac evaluation.

The overwhelming majority of individuals with MVP can secure traditional fully underwritten coverage at competitive rates, with only severe cases requiring surgery or demonstrating significant cardiac dysfunction facing higher table ratings or consideration of alternative coverage options.

For life insurance purposes, mitral valve prolapse is generally viewed as one of the most benign cardiac conditions, with the vast majority of cases presenting minimal long-term mortality risk when properly evaluated through echocardiographic assessment. Unlike progressive heart conditions requiring escalating interventions, most MVP remains stable throughout life without significant complications, making actuarial risk assessment straightforward when adequate clinical information is available.

This comprehensive guide explains how insurance companies evaluate different presentations of mitral valve prolapse using echocardiographic criteria, what specific factors influence your coverage options and rates, optimal timing for applications based on recent cardiac testing availability and strategies to secure the best possible terms including which carriers offer the most favorable MVP underwriting.

2-3%
General Population Prevalence
7.8M
Americans with MVP
2:1
Female to Male Ratio
1.4%
Community-Based Prevalence
Most
Asymptomatic Throughout Life
12 Months
Recent Echo Optimal for Applications

Understanding Mitral Valve Prolapse and Insurance

Key insight: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP), also called click-murmur syndrome or Barlow’s syndrome, is a common cardiac condition where one or both leaflets of the mitral valve bulge backward into the left atrium during heart contraction, and the vast majority of cases are benign with excellent prognosis, qualifying for preferred or standard life insurance rates.

Mitral valve prolapse occurs when the two flaps (leaflets) of the mitral valve—which controls blood flow between the heart’s upper left chamber (left atrium) and lower left chamber (left ventricle)—don’t close properly during heartbeats. Instead of closing smoothly, one or both leaflets bulge (prolapse) upward into the left atrium like a parachute. In most people with MVP, this backward billowing causes no problems and the valve still functions adequately. However, in some cases, the abnormal valve movement allows blood to leak backward from the left ventricle into the left atrium—a condition called mitral regurgitation.

The characteristic physical finding is a mid-systolic click heard through a stethoscope, which may or may not be followed by a late systolic murmur if mitral regurgitation is present. This distinctive sound—described as a “clicking” noise during heartbeat—led to the alternate name “click-murmur syndrome.” Most people with MVP are completely asymptomatic and discover their condition only during routine physical examination or cardiac testing for other reasons. When symptoms do occur, they may include heart palpitations, chest pain (typically atypical and not related to exertion), fatigue, dizziness, or shortness of breath, though many of these symptoms are now understood to be unrelated to the MVP itself and occur at similar rates in people without MVP.

The exact cause of primary MVP remains unknown in most cases—it’s considered an idiopathic condition. The valve leaflets become abnormally elastic and floppy, often with myxomatous degeneration (thickening with abnormal tissue composition). MVP can run in families, suggesting genetic inheritance, typically in an autosomal dominant pattern. MVP can also occur secondary to other conditions, particularly connective tissue disorders like Marfan syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, where the generalized connective tissue abnormality affects the valve structure. Importantly for insurance underwriting, the distinction between isolated primary MVP (no associated syndrome) and syndromic MVP (part of broader connective tissue disorder) carries different implications for prognosis and coverage consideration.

The prognosis for most people with MVP is excellent. Large population studies have shown that asymptomatic MVP without significant mitral regurgitation carries essentially normal life expectancy. The major concern with MVP is progression to severe mitral regurgitation requiring surgical repair or replacement, but this occurs in only a small minority of cases—estimated at less than 2-3% over a lifetime for those with initially mild MVP. Risk factors for progression include classic MVP with thickened leaflets (>5mm), presence of even mild mitral regurgitation at diagnosis (which can progress over time), male gender, older age, hypertension, and increased body mass index. Regular monitoring through periodic echocardiography allows early detection if progressive regurgitation develops, enabling timely surgical intervention when needed. This generally favorable natural history is why life insurance companies view MVP so favorably when proper documentation confirms stable, non-progressive status.

Professional Insight“When evaluating mitral valve prolapse applications, we emphasize to clients that having a recent echocardiogram with specific measurements is the single most important factor for optimal rates. An applicant who provides an echo report clearly documenting ‘MVP with trace mitral regurgitation, normal left atrial size, ejection fraction 60%’ receives dramatically better consideration than someone whose medical records only state ‘patient has MVP diagnosed by murmur’ without echo confirmation. We’ve seen identical MVP diagnoses result in preferred rates versus table 4 ratings based solely on whether adequate echocardiographic documentation was available. The investment in obtaining a current echo before applying—even if your physician hasn’t specifically recommended updated testing—often pays enormous dividends through better rate classifications. Many clients with MVP haven’t had an echo in 5-10 years, and carriers become conservative without recent objective data confirming stability. Spending $500-1000 on an updated echo can save thousands of dollars in premiums by demonstrating your MVP remains benign.”

– InsuranceBrokers USA – Management Team

Types and Classifications of MVP

Nonclassic MVP: Characterized by mitral valve leaflet displacement >2mm above the annular plane but with leaflet thickness <5mm during diastole. This represents the majority of MVP cases and carries excellent prognosis. Nonclassic MVP rarely progresses to significant mitral regurgitation and may receive no rating increase at all for life insurance—essentially treated as if you don’t have MVP. Many carriers offer preferred or preferred plus rates for nonclassic MVP without regurgitation.

Classic MVP: Defined by mitral valve leaflet displacement >2mm above the annular plane WITH leaflet thickness ≥5mm. This myxomatous degeneration of the valve leaflets carries higher risk of progression to severe mitral regurgitation over time. Classic MVP receives more conservative underwriting evaluation and typically results in at least standard rates, with table ratings applied if significant regurgitation present. However, even classic MVP with mild regurgitation and normal cardiac function usually qualifies for standard to table 2-4 ratings.

Isolated (Primary) MVP: MVP occurring without associated connective tissue disorder or other cardiac abnormalities. This represents the vast majority of cases and receives the most favorable underwriting consideration, as the condition is typically stable and not part of a progressive syndrome.

Syndromic (Secondary) MVP: MVP occurring as part of Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or other connective tissue disorders. These cases receive more conservative evaluation because the underlying syndrome may progress and affect multiple organ systems. The underwriting focuses as much on the systemic condition as the MVP itself, and rates depend heavily on overall syndrome severity and complications.

How Insurance Companies Evaluate MVP

Primary Underwriting Considerations

Insurance companies assess MVP applications through systematic evaluation of objective echocardiographic measurements combined with clinical assessment of symptoms and functional impact. Unlike many conditions requiring complex longitudinal analysis, MVP underwriting centers primarily on three quantifiable echo parameters that predict future complications.

Mitral Regurgitation Severity represents the most critical factor. Carriers classify regurgitation as none/trace, mild, moderate, or severe based on echocardiographic assessment of regurgitant volume and jet characteristics. No or trace regurgitation indicates the MVP is functionally insignificant—the valve is displaced but still closes adequately, preventing backward blood flow. This scenario often receives preferred or standard rates. Mild regurgitation means small amounts of blood leak backward but cardiac function remains normal. This typically results in standard to table 2 ratings. Moderate regurgitation indicates substantial backward flow requiring closer monitoring and possible future intervention, usually resulting in table 4-6 ratings. Severe regurgitation creates significant cardiac volume overload and typically requires surgical repair or replacement, often resulting in application postponement until surgery completed and recovery documented.

Mitral Valve Leaflet Thickness distinguishes classic from nonclassic MVP and predicts progression risk. Leaflets measuring <5mm indicate nonclassic MVP with minimal progression concern. Leaflets ≥5mm indicate myxomatous degeneration (classic MVP) with higher lifetime risk of requiring intervention. Carriers scrutinize classic MVP more carefully even when current regurgitation is minimal, as thickened leaflets are more likely to progress over time. However, classic MVP with stable measurements over several years provides reassurance that progression is unlikely, potentially improving rate consideration.

Left Atrial Size serves as a surrogate marker for chronic mitral regurgitation severity and duration. Normal left atrial dimensions indicate the regurgitation (if present) hasn’t caused chronic volume overload. Enlarged left atrium suggests the regurgitation has been significant enough over time to cause cardiac chamber dilation, indicating more advanced disease even if ejection fraction remains normal. Left atrial enlargement typically adds 2-4 tables to the rate classification regardless of other factors, as it indicates less favorable long-term prognosis.

Beyond these three core measurements, underwriters evaluate ejection fraction (normal >55% strongly favors approval), presence of arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation particularly concerning), symptom status (asymptomatic much better than symptomatic), medication requirements (no medications ideal; anticoagulants or anti-arrhythmics worrisome), and stability over time. Serial echocardiograms showing unchanging measurements over years provide powerful evidence of benign stable MVP, often improving rate classifications.

Coverage Outlook by MVP Severity

✓ Favorable Outcomes (Preferred or Standard Rates)

Benign MVP Without Significant Complications:

  • Nonclassic MVP (leaflet thickness <5mm) or classic MVP with normal leaflets
  • No mitral regurgitation or only trace regurgitation (physiologically insignificant)
  • Normal ejection fraction (>55-60%)
  • Normal left atrial size (not enlarged)
  • Completely asymptomatic or only occasional benign palpitations
  • No cardiac medications required (low-dose aspirin acceptable)
  • No history of arrhythmias, syncope, or cardiac events
  • Stable echo findings over time if multiple studies available
  • No associated connective tissue disorder (isolated MVP)

Expected Rates: Preferred Plus or Preferred rates are achievable for applicants otherwise in excellent health with documented nonclassic MVP and no regurgitation—some carriers essentially ignore benign MVP entirely for rating purposes. More commonly, Standard rates apply for any MVP with trace regurgitation or classic MVP even without regurgitation. A 35-year-old female non-smoker with benign MVP, trace mitral regurgitation, and normal echo might expect monthly premiums of $22-26 for a $500,000 20-year term policy—essentially identical to someone without MVP. Even classic MVP with mild regurgitation typically qualifies for Standard to Table 2, adding 0-50% to standard premiums. The key determinant is whether the echo demonstrates functionally normal valve despite anatomic prolapse.

⚠ Moderate Risk Scenarios (Standard to Table 2-6 Ratings)

MVP with Mild to Moderate Complications:

  • Classic MVP with thickened leaflets (≥5mm) even with mild regurgitation
  • Mild mitral regurgitation with normal or mildly enlarged left atrium
  • Moderate mitral regurgitation with preserved ejection fraction (>50%)
  • Mild left atrial enlargement without other significant complications
  • Occasional symptomatic palpitations controlled with medication
  • History of brief, self-terminating arrhythmias (no sustained episodes)
  • Taking beta-blockers or other cardiac medications for symptom control
  • Progressive regurgitation on serial echoes but not yet severe
  • MVP with mild associated mitral stenosis (uncommon combination)
  • MVP associated with well-controlled connective tissue disorder (mild Marfan syndrome)

Expected Rates: Standard to Table 2 ratings most common for mild regurgitation with all other favorable factors (preserving ejection fraction, normal atrial size, no symptoms). Moderate regurgitation or multiple mild findings (e.g., mild regurgitation plus mild atrial enlargement plus symptoms) typically result in Table 4-6 ratings, adding 100-150% to standard premiums. Progressive regurgitation documented on serial echoes warrants careful carrier selection, as some companies will decline while others offer table ratings if progression is slow and surgery not yet indicated. A 45-year-old male with classic MVP, mild-moderate regurgitation, ejection fraction 55%, taking beta-blocker for palpitations might expect monthly premiums of $140-190 for a $500,000 20-year term policy (compared to $95 at standard rates). Age at diagnosis matters—MVP diagnosed at younger age generally receives more favorable consideration than new diagnosis at older age, as it demonstrates long-term stability.

⚡ Higher Risk Categories (Table 6+ Ratings, Postponement, or Decline)

Severe MVP Complications:

  • Severe mitral regurgitation (regardless of symptoms or ejection fraction)
  • Significantly enlarged left atrium (>4.5-5.0 cm diameter)
  • Reduced ejection fraction (<50%) indicating ventricular dysfunction
  • History of mitral valve repair or replacement surgery
  • Persistent atrial fibrillation or other sustained arrhythmias
  • History of stroke or TIA attributed to MVP-related embolism
  • Heart failure symptoms (shortness of breath, exercise intolerance, edema)
  • Awaiting mitral valve surgery or recently recommended for surgery
  • Severe symptomatic MVP requiring anticoagulation
  • MVP associated with severe Marfan syndrome or rapidly progressive connective tissue disorder

Coverage Options: Severe mitral regurgitation with surgery recommended typically results in postponement until 6-12 months post-surgery, then table ratings (Table 6-8) based on surgical outcome and residual valve function. Post-surgical MVP with good result (normal valve function, normal ejection fraction, no residual regurgitation) can achieve Table 4-6 ratings after appropriate healing period. Severe MVP with significantly enlarged left atrium or reduced ejection fraction faces table ratings of Table 8-10 or possible decline for traditional coverage, depending on symptom severity and trajectory. History of MVP-related stroke adds substantial complexity and typically results in at least Table 8 if not decline. For cases declining traditional coverage, guaranteed issue or group coverage through employment provides alternatives. A 55-year-old with severe mitral regurgitation post-surgical repair 12 months ago, now with trace residual regurgitation and ejection fraction 52%, might expect Table 6-8 ratings, adding 150-200% to standard premiums, resulting in monthly costs around $325-385 for a $500,000 20-year term policy. Note that many severe MVP cases eventually stabilize post-surgery, and reapplication 2-3 years later with documented excellent surgical result may improve rate classifications.

For more insights on how various medical conditions affect coverage decisions, see our comprehensive guide on Life Insurance Approvals with Pre-Existing Medical Conditions.

Key Underwriting Factors

Echocardiographic Measurements and Clinical Assessment

Beyond the three primary echo measurements (regurgitation severity, leaflet thickness, left atrial size), insurance underwriters evaluate numerous additional factors when assessing MVP applications. Each element contributes to the overall risk profile and influences both approval likelihood and rate classification.

Factor Favorable Impact Adverse Impact
Ejection Fraction Normal to high-normal (>55-60%); hyperdynamic function (60-70%) sometimes seen with mild regurgitation Reduced ejection fraction (<50%); declining ejection fraction on serial studies; severe dysfunction (<40%)
Prolapse Pattern Isolated posterior leaflet prolapse (most common, best prognosis); minimal prolapse (2-3mm displacement) Bileaflet prolapse (both leaflets affected); marked prolapse (>5mm displacement); flail leaflet (complete leaflet eversion)
Valve Morphology Thin, pliable leaflets (<5mm); normal chordae tendineae; minimal redundancy Thickened leaflets (≥5mm); redundant, billowing leaflets; elongated or ruptured chordae; valve calcification
Age at Diagnosis Diagnosed in teens or twenties (demonstrates long stability if now older); incidental finding during routine exam New diagnosis after age 50 (less time to demonstrate stability); diagnosis prompted by symptoms or cardiac event
Symptoms Completely asymptomatic; only occasional benign palpitations unrelated to MVP Chest pain (even if atypical); frequent palpitations; syncope or presyncope; dyspnea on exertion; fatigue limiting activities
Arrhythmias No arrhythmias documented; rare premature beats on monitoring (common and benign) Frequent PVCs or PACs; supraventricular tachycardia; atrial fibrillation; ventricular tachycardia; requiring anti-arrhythmic medication
Medication Requirements No medications; low-dose aspirin only; no longer requiring medications previously used Beta-blockers for symptoms; anticoagulants (warfarin, novel anticoagulants); anti-arrhythmic agents; diuretics for heart failure
Stability Over Time Serial echoes unchanged over 5-10 years; regurgitation stable or improved; never progressed Progressive worsening on serial echoes; increasing regurgitation volume; enlarging left atrium; declining ejection fraction
Associated Conditions No other cardiac abnormalities; isolated MVP only; normal blood pressure and cholesterol Connective tissue disorder (Marfan, Ehlers-Danlos); other valvular disease; coronary artery disease; hypertension; diabetes
Complications History No complications ever; no endocarditis; no thromboembolic events; never required hospitalization Prior endocarditis; stroke or TIA; heart failure hospitalization; pulmonary edema; requirement for valve surgery

Family History and Genetic Factors

MVP often runs in families with autosomal dominant inheritance patterns. Family history of MVP itself doesn’t typically worsen underwriting significantly—many family members have benign stable MVP throughout life. However, family history of severe MVP requiring surgery at younger ages, or family history of connective tissue disorders like Marfan syndrome, raises concerns about more aggressive disease and may result in more conservative rate classifications. Conversely, having multiple family members with diagnosed MVP who remain asymptomatic and complication-free into older age provides reassurance about favorable prognosis.

Optimal Timing for Applications

With Recent Echocardiogram (<12 Months Old) (OPTIMAL TIMING)

Coverage Availability: Excellent for uncomplicated MVP; immediate consideration by all carriers.

Typical Rates: Preferred to Standard for benign MVP without regurgitation; Standard to Table 4 for mild regurgitation with favorable other parameters.

Recommendation: This represents optimal application timing regardless of how long you’ve had MVP. Carriers want current objective data confirming your MVP hasn’t progressed. An echo from 6-12 months ago provides fresh confirmation of stable status. If your last echo was more recent than 12 months, you can apply immediately with confidence. The echo report should clearly document all key measurements: regurgitation severity (preferably quantified, not just described), leaflet thickness, left atrial size, and ejection fraction. Our experience shows applications with complete recent echo documentation routinely receive 2-4 table rating improvements compared to applications where echo data is old or incomplete. One client example illustrates this perfectly: She had MVP diagnosed 15 years ago with an echo at that time showing trace regurgitation. She applied for insurance without obtaining updated echo, and the carrier postponed her application for 6 months pending current testing. After obtaining the new echo (which showed unchanged trace regurgitation), she reapplied and received Standard rates—the same outcome she could have had immediately with proper upfront documentation, saving 6 months delay.

Without Recent Echo (>2-3 Years Since Last Testing)

Coverage Availability: Limited; many carriers postpone pending updated testing or apply conservative ratings.

Typical Outcome: Postponement for 3-6 months until echo completed; or conservative table ratings (2-4 tables higher than with current echo).

Recommendation: If your last echo was more than 2-3 years ago, strongly consider obtaining updated testing before applying. Even if your physician hasn’t recommended repeat testing (many doctors only retest if symptoms develop), the investment in an updated echo typically pays for itself through better insurance rates. Echocardiograms cost approximately $500-1500 depending on location and whether insurance covers it. Compare this to potential premium savings—the difference between Standard and Table 4 rates on a $500,000 20-year term policy for a 45-year-old could be $4,000-8,000 over the policy life. Many carriers automatically default to Table 4-6 ratings for MVP without recent documentation, essentially assuming moderate disease until proven otherwise. Obtaining current echo shifts burden of proof in your favor, demonstrating stable benign disease rather than requiring underwriters to assume worst-case scenario.

After Recent MVP Diagnosis (Within Past 6-12 Months)

Coverage Availability: Good if diagnosis was incidental finding with benign echo; may face questions if diagnosis prompted by symptoms.

Typical Rates: Standard to Table 2-4 for recent diagnoses, as some carriers prefer seeing stability over time before offering best rates.

Recommendation: Recent MVP diagnosis doesn’t preclude insurance approval but may result in slightly more conservative initial ratings. If your MVP was discovered incidentally (routine physical exam, pre-employment screening, unrelated testing) and your echo shows benign findings, you can apply immediately. If MVP was diagnosed because of symptoms (palpitations, chest pain, murmur prompting workup), carriers may want to see 6-12 months of stability and symptom control before offering optimal rates. In either case, having the complete diagnostic workup including echo is essential. Some carriers are more comfortable with recent diagnoses than others—working with a broker who understands which companies offer favorable consideration for newly-diagnosed MVP can avoid postponements or unnecessarily conservative ratings.

After Mitral Valve Surgery (Repair or Replacement)

Coverage Availability: Postponed 6-12 months after surgery; then available with table ratings based on outcome.

Typical Rates: Table 4-8 depending on surgical result, residual valve function, ejection fraction recovery, and symptoms.

Recommendation: All carriers postpone applications for at least 6 months after mitral valve surgery to ensure surgical recovery is complete and complications haven’t developed. Most prefer seeing 12 months post-surgery before offering optimal rates for surgical cases. Post-surgical evaluation focuses on residual valve function (is repair complete with minimal or no regurgitation?), ejection fraction (has it recovered or improved to >55%?), left atrial size (has it decreased after successful surgery?), symptoms (are you now asymptomatic?), and medications (what ongoing treatment is required?). Best surgical outcomes—complete repair with trace or no residual regurgitation, normal ejection fraction, no anticoagulation required—can achieve Table 4-6 ratings. Less optimal outcomes with moderate residual regurgitation or persistent reduced ejection fraction typically receive Table 6-10 ratings. Plan to reapply 2-3 years post-surgery if initial ratings are high, as many surgical results continue improving over time and rate reclassification may be possible with documented excellent long-term outcome.

Required Medical Documentation

Essential Medical Records

  • Recent Echocardiogram Report (Critical): Complete transthoracic echocardiogram performed within past 12-24 months showing all standard measurements. The report MUST include: mitral regurgitation severity (ideally quantified with regurgitant volume and fraction, not just qualitative description), mitral valve leaflet thickness measurement in millimeters, left atrial dimension (anteroposterior diameter in cm), left ventricular ejection fraction (as percentage), and any comments about valve morphology, prolapse pattern, or other findings. Without this specific data, underwriters cannot accurately assess your MVP and will default to conservative assumptions. A simple note stating “patient has MVP” without measurements is insufficient.
  • Cardiology Consultation Notes: If you’ve seen a cardiologist for MVP, complete consultation notes including their assessment of severity, recommendations for monitoring, opinions on prognosis, and any treatment plans. Cardiologist statements like “benign MVP, annual monitoring sufficient” or “mild MVP without significant complications” carry substantial weight with underwriters. If you’ve never seen a cardiologist and MVP was diagnosed only by primary care physician, that’s acceptable for mild cases, but cardiology evaluation strengthens applications for anything beyond trace regurgitation.
  • Serial Echocardiograms (If Available): If you’ve had multiple echoes over the years, providing previous reports demonstrates stability over time. Showing unchanged echo parameters over 5-10 years is extremely favorable, proving your MVP isn’t progressive. Even if measurements have slightly worsened (e.g., trace to mild regurgitation), documenting slow progression helps underwriters understand disease trajectory better than single time-point assessment.
  • Cardiac Monitoring Results (If Applicable): If you’ve had Holter monitoring, event monitoring, or other rhythm assessment, provide complete results. Documentation showing “no significant arrhythmias” or “rare PVCs, clinically insignificant” reassures underwriters. If arrhythmias were found, complete description of type, frequency, and any treatment required becomes essential.
  • Stress Test Results (If Performed): Exercise stress test results, if available, provide additional functional assessment beyond resting echo. Normal stress test with no arrhythmias and normal hemodynamic response to exercise strengthens applications, particularly for applicants with moderate regurgitation where exercise capacity might be questioned.
  • Medication List and Purpose: Complete list of cardiac medications with clear indication. If taking medications, documentation should explain whether for symptom control (palpitations, chest pain) versus prevention (anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, antibiotic prophylaxis). Applicants not requiring any medications present most favorably. Those on medications need clear documentation showing the specific indication and demonstrating the medication successfully controls the target symptom or condition.
  • Surgical Records (If Applicable): For post-surgical MVP, complete operative report, discharge summary, and all follow-up echo reports showing surgical result. Documentation should demonstrate successful repair with minimal residual regurgitation or successful replacement with well-functioning prosthetic valve. Post-operative ejection fraction and improvement in symptoms compared to pre-operative status become key assessment points.
  • Genetic Testing Results (If Applicable): If MVP occurs as part of suspected connective tissue disorder, any genetic testing results or specialist evaluations (genetics, ophthalmology for lens dislocation in Marfan syndrome) should be provided. Confirmed diagnosis of Marfan syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome triggers different underwriting protocols focused on the systemic condition rather than isolated MVP.
Documentation TipWe strongly recommend obtaining your complete echo report and reviewing it yourself before applying for insurance. Many clients discover their physician told them “your heart looks fine” or “you have mild MVP, nothing to worry about,” but the actual echo report shows moderate regurgitation or other findings the physician didn’t emphasize because they don’t require immediate intervention. Understanding your actual echo measurements allows realistic expectations about insurance outcomes. Additionally, if your echo report uses vague language like “mild-to-moderate regurgitation” without quantification, consider asking your cardiologist whether repeat echo with specific regurgitant volume quantification would be beneficial—the difference between “mild” versus “moderate” classification can mean 4-6 table rating difference. We’ve worked with clients who obtained updated echoes specifically requesting quantitative assessment rather than qualitative estimates, and the clearer documentation resulted in 2-3 table improvement in their insurance offers.

Strategies to Improve Your Application

Before Applying

Obtain Current Echocardiogram: If your last echo was more than 12-18 months ago, schedule updated testing before applying. Even if you feel fine and your physician hasn’t recommended repeat testing, having current documentation provides the objective data underwriters require. Request that the echo include specific quantitative measurements of regurgitation (not just qualitative “mild” or “moderate” description) if possible, as quantified data allows more precise underwriting assessment.

Establish Cardiology Care If Needed: For MVP beyond simple nonclassic prolapse with trace regurgitation, establishing relationship with cardiologist (even if just annual monitoring) demonstrates appropriate medical management. Cardiology notes documenting “stable benign MVP, annual monitoring appropriate, excellent prognosis” significantly strengthen applications compared to only primary care management with sporadic follow-up.

Optimize Associated Health Factors: Since MVP underwriting also considers overall cardiovascular health, optimize controllable factors like blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, and exercise habits. An applicant with MVP plus hypertension and elevated cholesterol faces compounded concerns, while an applicant with MVP but otherwise excellent health metrics may receive favorable consideration despite the MVP. Additionally, if you’ve been sedentary due to MVP-related anxiety (common with MVP misdiagnosed as more serious than it is in past decades), resuming normal exercise demonstrates the MVP isn’t functionally limiting.

Gather Longitudinal History: If you’ve had MVP for many years, compile documentation showing long-term stability. An applicant with MVP diagnosed at age 25, now age 45 with three echoes over those 20 years showing unchanged findings, presents powerfully stable disease course. Underwriters reward demonstrated long-term benign nature.

During Application

Provide Comprehensive Disclosure: Disclose your complete MVP history including how it was discovered, all testing performed, any symptoms (even if transient or resolved), any medications tried (even if discontinued), and any specialist consultations. Attempting to minimize MVP as “just a murmur, no big deal” when you actually have moderate regurgitation and take medications backfires when medical records are reviewed. Conversely, over-emphasizing benign MVP with anxiety-related symptoms unrelated to the actual valve problem can also hurt—be accurate about the cardiac status versus generalized health concerns.

Emphasize Stability and Benign Nature: When completing the application and health questionnaire, clearly communicate if your MVP is stable, non-progressive, and not functionally limiting. Frame your MVP accurately—if you have trace regurgitation and normal echo, state this rather than just “I have MVP” (which could mean anything from benign to severe). If asked about activity limitations, be truthful—most MVP causes zero functional limitation, and stating you exercise normally, work without restrictions, and have no dyspnea provides important functional assessment.

Clarify Symptom Attribution: If you have symptoms commonly attributed to MVP (palpitations, chest pain, anxiety), provide context about whether these are actually caused by the MVP or are coincidental. Many people with MVP have benign palpitations unrelated to regurgitation or valve function—if your cardiologist has documented these symptoms as not concerning and unrelated to your stable MVP, ensure this information is conveyed. Underwriters need to distinguish between symptomatic MVP indicating progressive disease versus stable MVP with unrelated benign symptoms common in general population.

Carrier Selection Strategy

Mitral valve prolapse underwriting varies substantially among carriers, with some companies having particularly favorable MVP programs while others default to conservative table ratings for any MVP beyond trace findings. For applicants with benign nonclassic MVP and no regurgitation, most carriers offer excellent rates making carrier selection less critical. However, for classic MVP with mild regurgitation, moderate regurgitation with preserved function, or post-surgical MVP, carrier selection can mean the difference between standard and Table 6 ratings.

Several major carriers have developed specific MVP underwriting protocols recognizing that most MVP is benign and doesn’t warrant substantial ratings when properly documented. These companies may offer standard rates for mild regurgitation scenarios where other carriers default to Table 2-4. Working with an independent broker who understands which carriers specialize in cardiac conditions and specifically have favorable MVP underwriting becomes invaluable for anything beyond simple benign MVP.

Our Top 10 Best Life Insurance Companies in the U.S. (2025): Expert Broker Rankings provides insights into carriers with generally favorable cardiac underwriting, though MVP-specific carrier knowledge requires specialized expertise we’ve developed through handling hundreds of valve disorder applications.

Alternative Coverage Options

When Are Alternatives Necessary?

The overwhelming majority of individuals with MVP can qualify for traditional fully underwritten life insurance at preferred or standard rates. Alternative coverage options become relevant only for severe MVP cases—those with severe regurgitation, significantly reduced ejection fraction, heart failure symptoms, post-surgical complications, or MVP associated with severe systemic connective tissue disorders. Even moderate MVP usually qualifies for table-rated traditional coverage at reasonable costs, making alternatives unnecessary.

Simplified Issue Life Insurance

For individuals whose MVP complications make traditional coverage challenging (typically Table 8+ ratings or decline), simplified issue policies provide an alternative. These policies require no medical exam and ask only limited health questions. However, most simplified issue applications include questions about heart conditions requiring medication or hospitalization, which would exclude many moderate-severe MVP cases. Simplified issue works best for mild MVP that for some reason received unfavorable traditional underwriting—perhaps due to incomplete documentation or unfavorable carrier selection—allowing a do-over without full medical underwriting.

Coverage amounts typically range from $50,000-500,000 with higher premiums than fully underwritten coverage for healthy applicants but potentially better than very high table ratings from traditional underwriting. Approval is rapid, often within days, making simplified issue useful when coverage is needed urgently.

Group Life Insurance Through Employment

Employer-sponsored group life insurance requires no medical underwriting, providing guaranteed coverage (typically 1-2x salary) to all eligible employees regardless of health conditions. For someone with severe MVP complications facing traditional insurance challenges, maximizing group coverage and any available supplemental options should be first priority. Many employers offer voluntary supplemental life insurance allowing purchase of additional amounts (often $50,000-250,000) with limited or no underwriting during enrollment periods.

Group coverage limitations include loss upon employment termination (unless portable) and limited amounts that may not meet full family protection needs. However, it provides baseline coverage without health questions, and for severe MVP cases where individual traditional coverage is extremely expensive, group coverage may represent the most cost-effective approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will my life insurance application be declined if I have mitral valve prolapse?

No, the vast majority of MVP applications are approved, and most receive preferred or standard rates. MVP is the most common valvular condition and is well-understood by insurance underwriters, who recognize that most cases are benign and carry excellent prognosis. Declines occur only in severe scenarios: severe mitral regurgitation with reduced ejection fraction (<40%), recent diagnosis of severe MVP awaiting surgery evaluation, MVP causing heart failure symptoms requiring ongoing treatment, or MVP with history of serious complications like stroke or sustained arrhythmias. Even many of these severe cases eventually qualify for table-rated coverage once stabilized or after successful surgical intervention. For uncomplicated MVP—defined as nonclassic prolapse with no or trace regurgitation, normal left atrial size, normal ejection fraction, and no symptoms—many carriers offer preferred or standard rates identical to applicants without MVP. The key is providing comprehensive documentation of your specific MVP status rather than just noting “patient has MVP” without details. We’ve helped thousands of clients with MVP obtain coverage, and outright declines are rare, occurring in less than 5% of MVP applications and typically in cases with severe complications.

Can I qualify for preferred rates if I have MVP?

Yes, preferred rates (including Preferred Plus, the best rate class) are achievable for well-documented benign MVP. Applicants with nonclassic MVP (leaflet thickness <5mm), no mitral regurgitation or only trace regurgitation, normal left atrial size, normal ejection fraction, completely asymptomatic status, no cardiac medications, and otherwise excellent health often qualify for Preferred or even Preferred Plus rates at many carriers. Some insurance companies essentially ignore benign MVP entirely for rating purposes, recognizing that uncomplicated MVP carries essentially normal life expectancy. Classic MVP (thickened leaflets ≥5mm) has slightly lower probability of achieving preferred rates even when regurgitation is minimal, with Standard rates being more typical outcome. MVP with mild mitral regurgitation rarely receives preferred rates regardless of other factors—Standard to Table 2 represents expected outcome for mild regurgitation. Age and gender also influence preferred rate eligibility: younger female applicants with benign MVP have highest probability of achieving preferred rates, while older male applicants with even mild regurgitation typically receive Standard rates. Set realistic expectations: most MVP applicants receive Standard rates, which represent excellent outcomes and competitive premiums. Preferred rates are possible for optimal presentations but shouldn’t be expected in all cases. If you receive Standard rates for well-controlled MVP with mild regurgitation, this is a favorable outcome worth accepting rather than declining coverage hoping for better rates elsewhere.

How does mitral regurgitation severity affect my life insurance rates?

Mitral regurgitation severity represents the single most important factor determining MVP life insurance rates, with each increasing severity level typically adding 2-4 table ratings. No or trace regurgitation (blood flow backward through the valve is absent or physiologically insignificant) indicates functionally normal valve despite anatomic prolapse—this often qualifies for preferred or standard rates. Trace regurgitation is often reported on echoes because modern testing is extremely sensitive, but if the report notes it’s “physiologic” or “clinically insignificant,” underwriters treat it essentially as “no regurgitation.” Mild mitral regurgitation (small volume of backward flow, typically regurgitant fraction <30%) usually results in standard to Table 2-4 ratings depending on other factors like left atrial size and ejection fraction. Carriers differ in how they classify “mild”—some draw distinction between “mild” versus “mild-to-moderate,” with the latter receiving 2-3 tables worse consideration. Moderate mitral regurgitation (substantial backward flow, regurgitant fraction 30-50%) typically results in Table 4-8 ratings depending on ejection fraction, left atrial size, symptoms, and whether progression is documented. Carriers scrutinize moderate regurgitation carefully since it represents the threshold where surgical intervention may become necessary. Severe mitral regurgitation (regurgitant fraction >50%, significantly impaired forward flow) usually results in postponement pending surgical evaluation or very high table ratings (Table 10+) if surgery declined or applicant refusing surgery. Post-surgical applicants with successfully repaired valves showing trace or no residual regurgitation can achieve Table 4-6 ratings after appropriate recovery period. The quantification method matters—echoes reporting specific regurgitant volumes and fractions allow more precise underwriting than subjective descriptions. If your echo report states “moderate mitral regurgitation” without quantification, consider whether repeat echo with quantitative assessment might clarify whether you’re at lower or higher end of “moderate” range, potentially improving your rate classification.

Does it matter if I have classic versus nonclassic MVP?

Yes, the distinction between classic MVP (leaflet thickness ≥5mm) and nonclassic MVP (leaflet thickness <5mm) significantly impacts underwriting, with nonclassic MVP receiving more favorable consideration even when regurgitation severity is identical. Nonclassic MVP, which represents the majority of MVP cases, is characterized by thin pliable leaflets that prolapse but have normal tissue consistency. This form rarely progresses to severe regurgitation and carries excellent long-term prognosis—many carriers offer preferred or standard rates for nonclassic MVP even with trace regurgitation. Classic MVP features thickened leaflets with myxomatous degeneration (abnormal tissue composition), indicating higher lifetime risk of progression. Even when current regurgitation is minimal, classic MVP receives more conservative underwriting because the thickened leaflets are more likely to develop increasing regurgitation over years. Typical rate difference: nonclassic MVP with trace regurgitation might receive Preferred or Standard rates, while classic MVP with identical trace regurgitation receives Standard to Table 2 ratings at most carriers. The gap widens with increasing regurgitation—nonclassic MVP with mild regurgitation might get Standard to Table 2, while classic MVP with mild regurgitation gets Table 2-4. However, if classic MVP has demonstrated stability over many years (serial echoes showing unchanged leaflet thickness and regurgitation over 5-10 years), this long-term stability data can improve rate consideration, as it suggests the myxomatous process isn’t actively progressing. Your echo report should specify leaflet thickness—if it doesn’t, this represents important missing information and may be worth clarifying with repeat echo or reviewing images with your cardiologist.

Should I wait to apply for life insurance until my MVP has been stable for several years?

No, waiting is generally unnecessary and potentially counterproductive for uncomplicated MVP. If you have benign MVP with favorable echo parameters (no or trace regurgitation, normal left atrial size, normal ejection fraction), you can apply immediately even if recently diagnosed—carriers recognize benign MVP doesn’t require years of observation before favorable rating. The exception is if you have moderate regurgitation or other concerning findings where documenting stability over time (perhaps 1-2 years of unchanged echo results) might improve from Table 6 to Table 4 ratings—in these cases, strategic delay might be worthwhile if you can afford to wait. However, most MVP doesn’t benefit from delay—a 35-year-old with mild MVP and trace regurgitation receives similar rates whether applying today or 3 years from now, assuming echo remains stable. Reasons not to delay: life insurance costs increase with age (waiting 5 years means 5 years of higher premiums due to older age), health changes can occur (delaying doesn’t guarantee you remain healthy in other ways), and life insurance needs exist now (protecting family, securing insurability). If you need coverage and your MVP is stable based on recent echo, apply now rather than waiting years hoping for marginally better rates. The main exception is post-surgical MVP, where waiting 12-24 months after surgery allows demonstrating surgical success and recovery, potentially improving from Table 8 to Table 6 or better—this strategic delay makes sense given severity of surgical intervention.

Will my MVP diagnosis affect my ability to get life insurance if I also have another health condition?

Yes, MVP combined with other health conditions creates more complex underwriting, with the combined risk potentially exceeding the sum of individual conditions. Common combinations include: MVP plus hypertension (very common, since hypertension can worsen mitral regurgitation over time by increasing afterload)—this combination typically adds 2-4 tables beyond what either condition would receive alone; MVP plus diabetes (concerning because diabetes increases cardiovascular complications)—this combination often results in table ratings even if each condition individually might receive standard rates; MVP plus atrial fibrillation (serious concern as combination increases stroke risk and indicates possible cardiac dysfunction)—this often results in Table 6-10 or decline; MVP plus coronary artery disease (indicates widespread cardiac pathology)—usually Table 8+ or decline; MVP plus connective tissue disorder like Marfan syndrome (the underlying syndrome drives underwriting more than the MVP itself)—rates depend on Marfan severity and complications. The good news is that MVP plus common manageable conditions like well-controlled hypertension or well-managed diabetes still qualifies for coverage, just at higher table ratings than MVP alone. The key is demonstrating each condition is well-controlled with appropriate treatment and regular medical follow-up. Carriers become more conservative when multiple cardiac conditions coexist, as this suggests greater overall cardiovascular fragility. However, MVP plus completely unrelated conditions (MVP plus history of cancer, MVP plus thyroid disorder, etc.) are typically underwritten somewhat independently with less compounding concern, though total rating may still be additive.

If I had mitral valve repair surgery, how long should I wait before applying for life insurance?

All insurance carriers require waiting at least 6-12 months after mitral valve repair or replacement surgery before considering life insurance applications, allowing adequate time for surgical recovery and assessment of post-operative valve function. Most carriers prefer 12 months post-surgery for optimal rate consideration, though some will consider applications at 6 months if recovery has been uncomplicated. During this waiting period, focus on: completing all cardiac rehabilitation if prescribed, achieving optimal medical control of blood pressure and other cardiac risk factors, obtaining follow-up echocardiogram (typically performed at 3-6 months and 12 months post-surgery) documenting surgical result, discontinuing medications that may no longer be needed after successful repair, and returning to normal activities demonstrating functional recovery. When you do apply post-surgery, underwriters focus on: residual valve function (is the repair complete with no or minimal residual regurgitation? or is there significant residual leak?), ejection fraction (has it improved or recovered to >50-55%? or remains reduced?), left atrial size (has it decreased after successful surgery? or remains enlarged indicating chronic damage?), symptoms (are you now asymptomatic? or continue having dyspnea, fatigue, limitations?), medications (are you on minimal medications? or require ongoing anticoagulation, diuretics, etc.?), and surgical complications (was recovery uncomplicated? or were there issues like bleeding, infection, arrhythmias?). Best surgical outcomes—complete repair with trace or no residual regurgitation, normal ejection fraction, improved or normal left atrial size, no symptoms, minimal medications—can achieve Table 4-6 ratings at 12 months post-surgery. Less optimal outcomes typically receive Table 6-10. Consider reapplying 2-3 years post-surgery if initial ratings are high, as continued improvement in cardiac remodeling after successful surgery may allow better rates with longer follow-up demonstrating sustained excellent result.

Ready to Explore Your Life Insurance Options?

Mitral valve prolapse doesn’t have to complicate your life insurance journey. Whether you have benign MVP seeking preferred rates or more complex MVP requiring specialized carrier selection, we have the expertise to identify your optimal coverage options.

📞 Call Now: 888-211-6171

Free Confidential Consultation

All consultations are HIPAA compliant and completely confidential

About Our Cardiac Underwriting Specialists

50+
Carrier Options
15+
Years Experience

We specialize in securing life insurance coverage for individuals with mitral valve prolapse and other cardiac conditions. Our team understands that MVP is one of the most favorably underwritten cardiac conditions when properly documented, and we know exactly which carriers offer the most competitive rates for various MVP presentations—from benign nonclassic prolapse to post-surgical cases.

Our specialized services include:

  • Pre-application assessment determining whether your current echocardiogram is sufficient or updated testing would improve outcomes
  • Analysis of echo reports to identify the specific measurements underwriters need and whether additional documentation would strengthen your application
  • Strategic carrier selection matching your specific MVP profile (regurgitation severity, leaflet thickness, left atrial size) with companies offering most favorable cardiac underwriting
  • Guidance on timing—whether to apply immediately or wait for additional stability documentation based on your specific situation
  • Post-surgical MVP strategy, including optimal timing for applications and which carriers provide most favorable consideration for successfully repaired valves

Disclaimer

This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical or insurance advice. Individual coverage availability and pricing depend on personal health factors, MVP type and severity, mitral regurgitation degree, valve leaflet thickness, left atrial dimensions, ejection fraction, symptom status, medication requirements, and insurance company guidelines that vary significantly by carrier. Consult with licensed insurance professionals for guidance specific to your situation.

Medical Information Disclaimer

This article provides general information about life insurance for individuals with mitral valve prolapse (click-murmur syndrome, Barlow’s syndrome), offered for educational purposes. Individual circumstances vary significantly based on MVP classification (classic versus nonclassic), mitral regurgitation severity, associated cardiac conditions, surgical history, and numerous other factors. Outcomes depend on complete medical evaluation by licensed underwriters. All consultations are confidential and comply with HIPAA privacy requirements.

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment