🎯 Bottom Line Up Front
Carotid sinus syncope, also known as carotid sinus hypersensitivity or carotid sinus syndrome, is a condition where pressure on the carotid sinus in the neck triggers an exaggerated reflex response, leading to temporary loss of consciousness. This pressure can occur from simple activities like turning the head sharply, wearing tight collars, or shaving. The condition results from an overly sensitive carotid sinus that, when stimulated, causes either a dramatic drop in heart rate (cardioinhibitory type), a sudden decrease in blood pressure (vasodepressor type), or both (mixed type).
From a life insurance underwriting perspective, carotid sinus syncope presents unique challenges. The primary concern is not the syncope itself but the risk of injury from falls during unconscious episodes. Underwriters evaluate the frequency of episodes, circumstances that trigger them, effectiveness of preventive measures or treatment, and most critically, any history of injuries sustained during fainting episodes. Additionally, they assess whether the condition indicates underlying cardiovascular issues that may independently affect mortality risk.
This comprehensive guide explains how life insurance companies evaluate carotid sinus syncope, what factors influence your rate classification, documentation that strengthens your application, and strategies for securing optimal coverage despite this diagnosis.
Prevalence in Adults
Pacemaker Success Rate
Rate Classification
Understanding Carotid Sinus Syncope and Insurance Impact
Key insight: The insurance concern centers on injury risk from falls rather than the syncope mechanism itself.
Carotid sinus syncope occurs when pressure on the carotid sinus—a collection of specialized cells located at the bifurcation of the carotid artery in the neck—triggers a reflex that can dramatically slow the heart rate or drop blood pressure, resulting in temporary loss of consciousness. While the neurological mechanism is well understood, the degree to which individuals experience this reflex varies enormously, from mild lightheadedness to complete syncope with no warning.
✅ Favorable Scenarios
Well-controlled condition
- Rare episodes (1-2 per year or less)
- Clear triggers that can be avoided
- Effective pacemaker management
- No injuries from episodes
- No underlying heart disease
- Good symptom awareness
Expected: Standard to table ratings
⚠️ Moderate Risk Scenarios
Moderate frequency or management
- Monthly episodes despite treatment
- Recent diagnosis (under 12 months)
- Minor injuries from falls
- Unpredictable triggers
- Mixed-type syndrome
- Occupational limitations needed
Expected: Standard to table ratings
🔴 Challenging Scenarios
High-frequency or complicated cases
- Weekly or daily episodes
- Serious injuries (fractures, head trauma)
- Treatment-refractory symptoms
- Concurrent cardiac arrhythmias
- Significant lifestyle restrictions
- Recent serious fall complications
Expected: Table ratings or postponement
Professional Insight
“Carotid sinus syncope underwriting focuses heavily on two factors: frequency of episodes and injury history. An applicant with well-managed symptoms, perhaps one episode per year with a pacemaker in place and no injuries, presents very differently than someone with monthly episodes and a history of falls resulting in fractures. We’ve successfully placed clients with carotid sinus syndrome at standard rates when symptoms are rare and well-controlled, while others with frequent episodes may require table ratings reflecting the ongoing fall risk.”
– InsuranceBrokers USA – Management Team
For more insights on how various medical conditions affect coverage decisions, see our comprehensive guide on Life Insurance Approvals with Pre-Existing Medical Conditions.
How Insurers Evaluate Carotid Sinus Syncope
Key insight: Underwriters apply a risk-assessment framework prioritizing injury potential over the syncope diagnosis itself.
Life insurance companies evaluate carotid sinus syncope through a comprehensive analysis that extends beyond the diagnosis to assess real-world functional impact. Unlike many conditions where the primary concern is long-term mortality, syncope conditions are evaluated primarily for accident and injury risk, with secondary consideration of any underlying cardiovascular disease that may independently affect life expectancy.
| Evaluation Category | What Underwriters Assess | Impact on Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Episode Frequency | Number of syncope events per month/year | Rare episodes = better rates |
| Injury History | Falls, fractures, head trauma, lacerations | No injuries = significant advantage |
| Treatment Effectiveness | Pacemaker response, medication efficacy | Good control = favorable consideration |
| Warning Symptoms | Prodromal symptoms before syncope | Warning signs = lower injury risk |
| Trigger Predictability | Identifiable triggers vs. unpredictable | Predictable = risk mitigation possible |
| Underlying Cardiac Issues | Heart disease, arrhythmias, structural problems | Additional conditions = higher ratings |
| Lifestyle Modifications | Activity restrictions, occupational changes | Significant limitations = higher risk signal |
| Age at Diagnosis | Onset age and current age | Older onset = generally more favorable |
⚠️ The Injury Risk Factor
Underwriters pay particular attention to injury history because it demonstrates real-world risk materialization. An applicant reporting multiple syncope episodes but no injuries signals either good warning symptoms, safe environments, or effective protective behaviors. Conversely, even infrequent episodes that have resulted in significant injuries (fractures, head trauma requiring hospitalization) dramatically elevate underwriter concern about future accident-related claims.
This is why documentation emphasizing injury-free periods, protective measures taken, and environmental modifications carries substantial weight in the underwriting process.
Given the increased risk of accidents and potential injuries, you might also consider our comparison of Accidental Death vs Life Insurance as a supplemental option for comprehensive protection.
Critical Underwriting Factors
Key insight: Seven specific factors determine your rate classification, with episode frequency and injury history carrying the most weight.
✓ Optimal Profile for Standard to Mild Table Ratings
- Episode frequency: Less than 2-3 episodes per year, ideally only 1-2
- Injury-free history: No falls resulting in fractures, head trauma, or significant lacerations
- Effective management: Successful pacemaker implantation with dramatic symptom reduction, or well-managed with conservative measures
- Prodromal symptoms: Consistent warning signs (dizziness, lightheadedness) that allow protective positioning before syncope
- Identifiable triggers: Clear precipitants (tight collars, rapid head turning) that can be consciously avoided
- No cardiac complications: Absence of concurrent arrhythmias, structural heart disease, or coronary artery disease
- Stable pattern: Symptoms consistent over time without worsening frequency or severity
- Compliance: Regular follow-up with cardiologist, adherence to treatment recommendations
- Functional independence: Minimal activity restrictions, able to maintain normal lifestyle
⚠️ Factors Resulting in Moderate Table Ratings
- Moderate frequency: 3-10 episodes per year despite treatment attempts
- Minor injuries: Bruises, minor lacerations, single uncomplicated fracture from fall
- Recent diagnosis: Less than 12 months since diagnosis with treatment still being optimized
- Unpredictable episodes: Syncope occurring without warning or identifiable triggers
- Mixed-type syndrome: Both cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor components present
- Partial treatment response: Pacemaker or medications reduced but did not eliminate episodes
- Occupational modifications: Required job changes or restrictions due to syncope risk
- Driving restrictions: Medical prohibition or self-imposed driving cessation
🔴 Red Flags for Higher Ratings or Postponement
- High frequency: Weekly or daily episodes suggesting treatment-refractory disease
- Serious injuries: Multiple fractures, skull fractures, intracranial bleeding, spinal injuries
- Treatment failure: Pacemaker implanted but symptoms persist at same frequency
- Concurrent arrhythmias: Atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, or other rhythm disorders
- Structural heart disease: Significant valvular disease, cardiomyopathy, or heart failure
- Recent serious complication: Recent hospitalization for syncope-related injury within past 6 months
- Progressive worsening: Increasing episode frequency or severity over time
- Non-compliance: Missed appointments, refused recommended treatment (pacemaker), medication non-adherence
Professional Insight
“The distinction between carotid sinus syncope with good management versus poor control is substantial in underwriting outcomes. We recently placed a client who had carotid sinus syndrome with about two episodes per year, managed with a pacemaker, and no injuries—they received a standard plus rating. Another client with similar diagnosis but monthly episodes and a history of a wrist fracture from a fall received a Table 3 rating. The difference wasn’t the diagnosis but the demonstrated real-world risk profile.”
– InsuranceBrokers USA – Management Team
Treatment Options and Their Impact on Insurability
Key insight: Effective treatment implementation significantly improves rate classifications, with pacemaker therapy showing the most favorable outcomes.
The approach to managing carotid sinus syncope ranges from conservative lifestyle modifications to permanent pacemaker implantation. From an insurance perspective, documented treatment attempts and their effectiveness play a crucial role in determining risk classification, with successful interventions dramatically improving insurability.
Conservative Management
- Trigger avoidance: Loose collars, careful head movements
- Hydration optimization: Maintaining fluid intake
- Position changes: Slow transitions, protective positioning
- Environmental modifications: Carpeting, removal of fall hazards
- Compression garments: Support stockings for vasodepressor type
Insurance Impact: Effective for mild cases; documentation of compliance helps underwriting
Medical Therapy
- Midodrine: Alpha-agonist for blood pressure support
- Fludrocortisone: Mineralocorticoid to increase blood volume
- Beta-blockers: May help in some vasodepressor cases
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Occasionally used
Insurance Impact: Mixed—shows proactive management but also indicates condition requires ongoing treatment
Pacemaker Therapy
- Dual-chamber pacing: Standard approach for cardioinhibitory type
- Rate-drop response: Specialized algorithm for syncope
- Success rates: 70-90% reduction in episodes
- Complications rare: Modern devices highly reliable
Insurance Impact: Generally favorable—demonstrates definitive treatment with objective monitoring of effectiveness
| Treatment Status | Typical Underwriting View | Expected Rate Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative management, rare episodes | Mild condition with adequate control | Standard to Table 2 |
| Pacemaker with excellent response | Definitive treatment, objective monitoring | Standard to Table 2 |
| Pacemaker with partial response | Condition more severe than initially assessed | Table 2 to Table 4 |
| Medication management, stable | Moderate severity requiring ongoing treatment | Table 2 to Table 3 |
| Multiple treatments, persistent symptoms | Treatment-refractory, higher risk | Table 4 to Table 6 |
| No treatment, frequent episodes | Concerning—either non-compliant or undiagnosed severe | Table 4 to postponement |
💡 Optimal Insurance Timing: Post-Pacemaker Placement
For individuals with carotid sinus syncope undergoing pacemaker implantation, the best time to apply for life insurance is typically 6-12 months after the procedure, once you can demonstrate:
- Successful pacemaker function with interrogation reports showing appropriate pacing
- Significant reduction or elimination of syncope episodes
- No complications from the device implantation
- Stable medication regimen (if any additional medications needed)
- Return to normal activities without restrictions
This documentation period allows underwriters to see objective evidence of treatment success rather than theoretical benefit, often resulting in 1-2 table class improvement over immediate post-implant applications.
Essential Medical Documentation
Key insight: Comprehensive documentation emphasizing episode frequency, injury-free periods, and treatment effectiveness accelerates approval and improves ratings.
Providing thorough medical records upfront prevents underwriting delays and ensures decision-makers have complete context for assessing your risk profile. For carotid sinus syncope, specific documentation beyond standard medical records significantly strengthens applications.
📋 Core Documentation Requirements
- Cardiology consultation notes with initial diagnosis, tilt table test results, carotid sinus massage findings
- Complete episode log documenting dates, circumstances, warning symptoms, and outcomes of all syncope events
- Injury history documentation (or statement of no injuries) from all healthcare providers
- Electrocardiogram (ECG) results showing baseline rhythm and any abnormalities
- Echocardiogram report if performed to rule out structural heart disease
- Holter monitor or event recorder results capturing rhythm during symptoms if available
- Pacemaker implant operative note if device placed, including device type and settings
- Pacemaker interrogation reports showing device function, pacing percentages, and any recorded events
- Medication list with dosages and duration of any drugs used for syncope management
- Recent cardiology follow-up note (within past 6 months) summarizing current status and prognosis
✅ Documentation That Strengthens Applications
- Physician letter confirming infrequent episodes (quantified)
- Specific statement: “No injuries from syncope episodes”
- Pacemaker data showing reduction in syncope burden
- Evidence of trigger identification and avoidance success
- Stable employment with no work restrictions
- Active lifestyle documentation (if applicable)
- Statement that patient drives safely (if medically cleared)
⚠️ Documentation Gaps to Address
- Vague episode descriptions without frequency data
- Missing injury history (creates uncertainty)
- No recent cardiology follow-up (suggests poor compliance)
- Incomplete pacemaker records (can’t verify effectiveness)
- Absent baseline cardiac workup (underlying disease unclear)
- No treatment plan documented (appears unmanaged)
- Conflicting information between providers
Professional Insight
“One of the most valuable pieces of documentation for carotid sinus syncope applications is a detailed physician statement specifically addressing the questions underwriters will ask: How many episodes in the past 12 months? Any injuries ever? What treatment has been tried and how effective? Any warning symptoms? What’s the prognosis? A cardiologist letter answering these questions upfront can reduce underwriting from 4-6 weeks to 2-3 weeks and often results in better rate classifications because it addresses concerns before they become obstacles.”
– InsuranceBrokers USA – Management Team
⚠️ Critical: Accurate Episode Reporting
Underwriters distinguish between different types of episodes, so precise terminology matters:
- Syncope: Complete loss of consciousness with falling
- Pre-syncope: Near-fainting with lightheadedness but no loss of consciousness
- Dizziness: Sensation of unsteadiness without clear near-fainting
Ensure your medical records and application clearly distinguish between these, as true syncope episodes carry more weight in underwriting than pre-syncopal events. Some applicants inadvertently over-report by including every dizzy spell as a syncope episode, resulting in unnecessarily conservative risk assessment.
Carrier Selection Strategies
Key insight: Insurance companies vary significantly in their assessment of syncope conditions, making strategic carrier selection essential.
Life insurance carriers differ substantially in their underwriting guidelines for carotid sinus syncope, with some having specific rating schedules for syncope conditions and others evaluating each case individually. Understanding these differences and matching your specific risk profile to receptive carriers dramatically improves outcomes.
Carrier Characteristics
- Neurocardiology expertise: Larger carriers with specialized syncope underwriters
- Pacemaker experience: Some carriers have extensive database of pacemaker patient outcomes
- Injury-focused vs. diagnosis-focused: Varies by company philosophy
- Episode frequency thresholds: Different tolerance levels for annual episode counts
- Age considerations: Some more favorable for older applicants with syncope
Profile Matching
- Well-controlled cases: Carriers emphasizing current management over diagnosis
- Pacemaker patients: Companies with cardiac device underwriting experience
- Recent diagnosis: Carriers allowing shorter time periods for stabilization
- Older applicants: Companies viewing age-appropriate syncope more favorably
- Complex medical histories: Niche carriers specializing in high-risk medical
Our guide on Top 10 Best Life Insurance Companies in the U.S. (2025): Expert Broker Rankings can help identify carriers most likely to provide favorable consideration for cardiovascular conditions including syncope disorders.
| Applicant Profile | Carrier Selection Strategy | Expected Outcome Range |
|---|---|---|
| Rare episodes, no injuries, pacemaker | Target multiple standard markets competitively | Standard to Table 2 |
| Moderate frequency, well-managed | Focus on carriers with tiered syncope ratings | Table 2 to Table 4 |
| Recent diagnosis, treatment ongoing | Consider carriers allowing shorter stabilization | Table 3 to Table 5 |
| History of injuries from falls | Specialized substandard risk carriers | Table 4 to Table 6 |
| High frequency, treatment-refractory | Niche high-risk or guaranteed issue markets | Table 6+ or guaranteed issue |
🔴 Avoid These Carrier Selection Mistakes
- Shotgun approach: Applying to multiple carriers simultaneously without strategy creates multiple underwriting files and potential for consistent ratings across all
- Online-only applications: Syncope cases benefit from underwriter interaction that online platforms don’t allow
- Ignoring company specialties: Some carriers excel at cardiac device patients while others focus on injury-free episode management
- Timing errors: Applying too soon after diagnosis or treatment changes
- Incomplete disclosure: Underreporting episode frequency or injury history always discovered during medical records review
💡 Multi-Carrier Competitive Strategy
For well-controlled carotid sinus syncope cases, consider this approach:
- Pre-screen with 3-4 carriers: Informal underwriting to gauge receptivity
- Submit to most favorable 2 carriers: Competitive offers allow negotiation
- Leverage better offer: Use more favorable rate class to request reconsideration from other carrier
- Have backup plan: If both rate higher than expected, activate alternative carrier strategy
This structured approach provides options without creating excessive underwriting records, and the competitive pressure often results in improved rate class offers.
Application Process and Optimization
Key insight: Strategic application timing and comprehensive documentation preparation significantly impact both approval likelihood and rate classification.
The application process for carotid sinus syncope requires more careful orchestration than standard cases. From pre-application preparation through final policy issuance, each phase offers opportunities to strengthen your presentation and address underwriter concerns proactively.
Phase 1: Pre-Application Preparation (2-4 Weeks)
Essential Preparation Steps:
- Medical records collection: Request complete records from all treating physicians, especially detailed cardiology notes and pacemaker interrogation reports
- Episode documentation: Create comprehensive log of all syncope episodes with dates, circumstances, injuries (or lack thereof)
- Treatment timeline: Document all interventions tried and their effectiveness
- Physician statement request: Ask cardiologist for letter summarizing condition, treatment, prognosis, and episode frequency
- Informal underwriting: Work with broker to get preliminary carrier feedback without formal application
- Financial planning: Determine optimal coverage amount considering potential ratings
Phase 2: Application Submission and Underwriting (3-6 Weeks)
Critical Actions:
- Complete disclosure: Accurate episode counts, all treatments, any injuries however minor
- Medical questionnaire: Provide detailed responses emphasizing management success and injury-free periods
- Paramedical examination: Schedule promptly; examiner will ask detailed questions about syncope
- APS authorization: Sign medical records releases immediately to avoid delays
- Proactive documentation: Submit physician letter and episode log with initial application rather than waiting for requests
- Underwriter communication: Respond to all inquiries same-day when possible
- Clarification opportunities: Use underwriter questions as chances to emphasize positive aspects
Phase 3: Offer Review and Optimization (1-2 Weeks)
Response Strategies:
- Offer assessment: Compare to expected outcomes from informal underwriting phase
- Rating explanation: Request detailed rationale for any table ratings applied
- Appeal preparation: If rated higher than expected, gather additional supporting documentation
- Physician advocacy: Request updated letter from cardiologist if circumstances have improved
- Comparative leverage: If you have multiple offers, use more favorable one to negotiate
- Alternative structures: Consider policy riders, lower face amounts, or term conversions if helpful
- Backup activation: If primary carriers unsatisfactory, submit to pre-identified alternatives
✅ Application Optimization Checklist
- Timing optimized—applied at least 6-12 months after diagnosis or treatment stabilization
- Complete episode log prepared showing frequency trend and any decrease over time
- Comprehensive injury history documented (or clear statement of injury-free status)
- Recent cardiology follow-up within past 6 months demonstrating stability
- Pacemaker interrogation reports if device present, showing effective function
- All medications and dosages documented with indication and effectiveness
- Lifestyle modifications and trigger avoidance strategies documented
- Physician statement obtained addressing key underwriting concerns
- Employment status and any work restrictions (or lack thereof) clarified
- Driving status addressed—medically cleared or voluntary restrictions noted
- Other health conditions disclosed and documented to prevent future issues
- Financial justification for coverage amount prepared if high face value
⚠️ Common Application Pitfalls
- Applying too soon: Within weeks of diagnosis or treatment initiation before effectiveness demonstrated
- Incomplete episode information: Vague responses like “occasional episodes” rather than “2 episodes in past 12 months”
- Downplaying concerns: Minimizing injuries or episode frequency; always discovered in medical records and creates credibility issues
- Missing recent follow-up: Old records without current status assessment raises questions about current control
- Poor coordination: Multiple providers with conflicting documentation; ensure consistency across all records
- Ignoring underwriter questions: Delayed responses to information requests significantly extend timeline
Professional Insight
“Timing makes an enormous difference in carotid sinus syncope underwriting. We had a client apply 3 months after pacemaker implantation with only two follow-ups showing good initial response—they received a Table 4 offer with the carrier noting ‘insufficient time to demonstrate long-term effectiveness.’ We advised waiting another 6 months, gathered three additional pacemaker interrogations showing consistent performance and only one brief pre-syncopal episode, and reapplied. Same client, same carrier, but now with 9 months of documented success—received Table 2. The wait cost nothing but saved over $1,800 annually in premiums for a $500,000 policy.”
– InsuranceBrokers USA – Management Team
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I get life insurance with carotid sinus syncope?
Yes, most individuals with carotid sinus syncope can obtain life insurance, though rate classifications vary based on episode frequency, injury history, and treatment effectiveness. Well-controlled cases with infrequent episodes and no injuries typically receive standard to table ratings, while those with more frequent episodes or injury history may receive moderate table ratings. Even individuals with challenging cases can usually find coverage, though potentially through specialized high-risk carriers or with higher ratings. The key is demonstrating effective management and minimizing fall-related injury risk.
How do pacemakers affect life insurance rates for carotid sinus syncope?
Pacemakers generally have a neutral to positive impact on insurability for carotid sinus syncope. While having a cardiac device indicates a more significant condition that required intervention, successful pacemaker therapy that dramatically reduces episode frequency is viewed favorably by underwriters. Most carriers evaluate pacemaker patients based on pre-implant symptom severity, post-implant symptom reduction, device function, and any residual episodes. A patient with a pacemaker and rare or no subsequent episodes often receives better rates than someone without a pacemaker who has monthly episodes, as the device demonstrates both definitive treatment and objective monitoring.
Will life insurance companies know about every syncope episode I’ve had?
Yes, insurance companies will learn about all documented syncope episodes through your medical records review. Underwriters request complete records from all physicians you’ve seen, including emergency department visits, cardiology consultations, and primary care notes. Even episodes you may have forgotten will appear in these records. It’s crucial to be thorough and accurate on your application, as discrepancies between your application and medical records raise concerns about credibility and can result in declined coverage or, worse, claim denial later if the policy is issued based on incomplete information.
Does having injuries from falls automatically disqualify me from coverage?
No, injury history does not automatically disqualify you, but it does significantly impact your rate classification. Underwriters view injuries as evidence that syncope episodes pose real accident risk. However, the type, severity, and recency of injuries matter substantially. A single minor injury several years ago with no subsequent episodes carries far less weight than multiple serious injuries or recent fractures. Additionally, evidence that you’ve since had episodes without injury (perhaps due to better management or warning symptoms) helps demonstrate reduced current risk. Most applicants with injury history can still obtain coverage, typically at table ratings that reflect the demonstrated accident risk.
How long should I wait after diagnosis before applying for life insurance?
For optimal rate classifications, waiting 6-12 months after diagnosis and treatment initiation allows you to demonstrate stable management and effectiveness. This timeframe provides sufficient documentation showing episode frequency patterns, treatment response, and importantly, a period demonstrating you haven’t had serious injuries. If you’ve had a pacemaker implanted, waiting until you have at least two device interrogations showing good function and reduced symptoms strengthens your application significantly. However, if you have urgent coverage needs, some carriers will consider applications earlier, though likely at higher initial ratings with potential for re-rating after additional time passes.
Should I disclose syncope episodes that didn’t result in falls or injuries?
Yes, you must disclose all syncope episodes regardless of outcome. Insurance applications ask about loss of consciousness events, not just those resulting in injuries. Moreover, medical records will document all reported episodes, and discrepancies between your application and records create serious problems. However, it’s appropriate to distinguish between true syncope (complete loss of consciousness), pre-syncope (near-fainting without losing consciousness), and simple dizziness. Being precise in your terminology ensures underwriters assess your actual risk level accurately rather than assuming worst-case scenarios.
What if my carotid sinus syncope episodes are very infrequent but unpredictable?
Unpredictability is a concern for underwriters because it suggests higher injury risk—if you can’t anticipate episodes, you can’t take protective measures. However, very low frequency (one episode per year or less) partially mitigates this concern. The best strategy is documenting any patterns you have identified (even if triggers aren’t completely predictable), environmental safety modifications you’ve made to reduce injury risk, and most importantly, any prodromal symptoms (warning signs) that give you even brief notice. If you’ve had several years of very infrequent episodes without injuries despite unpredictability, this track record carries significant weight with underwriters.
Are there alternative insurance options if traditional policies rate me too high?
Yes, several alternatives exist depending on the challenges you face with traditional fully-underwritten policies. Simplified issue life insurance requires less medical information and may be more accessible, though with higher premiums. Guaranteed issue policies accept all applicants regardless of health but typically offer smaller face amounts with graded death benefits. Group life insurance through an employer often provides coverage without individual medical underwriting. Some carriers offer graded premium structures where you pay higher rates initially with reductions after demonstrating continued good health. An experienced broker can identify which alternatives best match your specific situation and coverage needs while you work toward qualifying for better traditional rates.
Ready to Explore Your Life Insurance Options?
Whether you’re recently diagnosed with carotid sinus syncope or have years of successful management, securing optimal life insurance coverage requires specialized expertise in cardiovascular underwriting. Our team works with over 40 carriers to match your specific health profile with the most receptive underwriters, ensuring you receive the best possible rates for your situation.
Free confidential consultation – All consultations are HIPAA compliant
